Don’t get me wrong. These books were all right. They were fun. They were dystopian. They were quick and enjoyable. They were good…but not great.
In these three books (The Hunger Games, Catching Fire, and Mockingjay) North America is a dystopian society divided into districts controlled by the government. Children are annually drawn from the districts to fight in the Games, essentially gladiators in a higher-tech Coliseum. And as the books go on, it gets more complicated and more people die and stuff like that. Cool!
Contrary to some reviews I’ve read, I really didn’t have an issue with the books morally. One person said that he was disappointed with the lack of remorse or guilt on the part of the Games participants, and that therefore the books support a poor moral backdrop. I disagree; they’re gladiators in a totally dystopian and amoral society. Of course they don’t have much remorse (which, if the reviewer had read the other two books, I think he would have actually found some). They’re survivors after an apocalypse. It’s a nasty place. It’s quite like modern day America.
So that doesn’t bother me. And really, nothing about the books really bothers me, but if anything were to bother me it’d just be the quality of the books. These are works of popular fiction, and thus they join the shelves of a lot of other stuff by Tom Clancy or John Grisham or Stephen King. All good stuff, but not great stuff. It is what it is. They get turned into movies. They sell merchandise. I’m fine with this…as long as the books are taken for what they are.
Sure, they’re infinitely better than Twilight, but they fall flat beneath Harry Potter, for example, which I steadfastly believe will be considered a classic in a hundred years. They’re not innovative. For those who think they are, I would like to refer you to a host of apocalyptic/dystopian literature that The Hunger Games borrows from, including Lucifer’s Hammer, 1984, A Canticle For Leibowitz, Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World, Ender’s Game, The Children of Men…
The Hunger Games is modular. Formulaic. Scripted. There’s the typical love triangle. There’s good vs. evil. There’s archetypes like the old drunk, the fawning Barbie doll, the iron ruler, etc etc. To support this formulaic and clichéd structure, there’s a lot of crutches that Suzanne Collins puts into place. Let me address a few of these crutches.
Vocabulary. She comes up with words like “propo” to stand for propaganda PSAs, or the word “muttation” to describe a…mutated mutt? Really, this is weak. Don’t get me started on names of things. Instead of calling a poisonous berry hemlock, she calls it nightlock. To come up with a good name for mute slaves, she gets all down in her Latin and calls them Avox. Get it? Avox? No vox? No vocals?
Names. Katniss, Gale, Cinna, Snow, Cato, Pollux, Finnick? It’s so stinkin’ Star Wars-esque! Surely something survived the apocalypse. If people got through it with their language skills, reproductive abilities, and survival instincts intact I am absolutely sure that common first names like John or Tim or Jessica would still be intact.
Improbability. Some of the things she describes are definitely sprung from the imagination of someone wearing mom pants, the type that try to hide the milkshake muffin top. Explain to me again why there were booby traps in the Capitol, like exploding flower pots? Explain to me again why an entire street in the Capitol is booby-hinged, so people fall down into a dark pit full of animals?
Combat Scenarios. I feel like Mother Teresa could have written better combat scenarios. They’re muddy, very mom-pants, very confusing, and at the end of the fight scenes all you know is that some people are dead and some people are alive. Plus, the heroine is using a bow. So while cruise missiles and hovercraft are dropping left and right, Katniss is pulling a Legolas and running around shooting arrows.
Character Nondevelopment. It’s written in first person…yet somehow you never figure out what she’s thinking. And nobody changes. Peeta stays limp and blonde. Gale stays tough and distant. Katniss stays cold and hard. It’s flat. Extremely flat. And you never really like anybody or figure anybody out.
So.
Did I enjoy the books? Yeah. The first one was fun, the second passable, the third blah. That’s it.
Should millions of teenage girls wring their hands in anticipation during the Games? Nope. Teenage girl, you should watch Gladiator, where Russell Crowe slashes off heads left and right.
Should millions of teenage girls shake their heads in amazement as they read of the technological wonders of the Capitol? Nope. Teenage girl, you should watch Blade Runner, where there’s an entire sci-fi cityscape…complete with hovercrafts and robots and Harrison Ford and pyramids.
Should millions of teenage girls cry themselves to sleep at night because Katniss doesn’t love Peeta or Gale enough? Nope. Teenage girl, you should read The Count of Monte Cristo, where you will then cry yourself into a silly little coma because Mercedes doesn’t ever love Edmond Dantes enough.
The Hunger Games is for passable fun.
Let’s rate it on a scale of beers. If on one end of the spectrum you have Guinness Draught from the tap, and on the other end you have Schlitz in a can, then The Hunger Games is a Pabst Blue Ribbon tallboy. It’s cheap, fast, and fun. And that’s about it.